The idea that China is a rising adversary that threatens the long-term position of the United States and potentially the global order is widespread. To be fair to the Biden team, a confrontational stance toward China enjoys broad public support. sanctions on Chinese officials for human rights violations in Hong Kong and against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang. In fact, the meeting was both preceded and followed by announcements of more U.S. Hostility was evident, and there was little mention of a next round of trade deals or lifting the tariffs currently placed on Chinese imports by the U.S. In the rest of the talks, the newly minted Biden administration reaffirmed the Trump administration’s aggressive policies of treating China as the main adversary of the United States. racism against Black and Asian Americans. government “abuses so-called notions of national security to obstruct normal trade exchanges and incite some countries to attack China.” It reeks of hypocrisy, he continued, for the United States to criticize China on human rights given U.S. Blinken said China’s actions on multiple fronts, from treatment of the Uyghurs to suppression of democracy in Hong Kong, “threaten the rules-based order that maintains global stability.” Yang shot back that the U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Chinese top diplomat Yang Jiechi was indeed notably candid. Headlines ranged from “ ‘Tough’ U.S.-China talks signal rocky start to relations under Biden” to “ Bitter Alaska Meeting Complicates Already Shaky U.S.-China Ties.” And the public and apparently impromptu back-and-forth between U.S. and Chinese foreign-policy officials in Anchorage, Alaska, made for a juicy news story. The tense meeting last week between senior U.S. President Joe Biden appears to be adopting large swaths of Trump’s policies and even many of the former president’s basic presumptions, namely that China is the United States’ main adversary and that even though there are many areas of mutual interest and cooperation between the two, competition is the hallmark of an increasingly tense relationship. The trade deficit remained astronomical (not necessarily a bad thing but which Trump cited as a reason for his policies), factories remained offshore, there was no end to China’s human rights violations, and China’s influence increased globally. It changed the basic parameters of the two countries’ relationship not a whit. withdrawal from the multilateral Trans-Pacific Partnership.Įven if one agreed that the United States needed to stand up to China on some issues, Trump’s approach only succeeded in increasing animosity and reducing Chinese investment and purchases from the United States. His threats were made even more toothless by the U.S. President Donald Trump’s secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, about Chinese human rights transgressions fell with a thud because of Trump’s inability to muster international support. These provoked retaliatory Chinese actions that necessitated tens of billions of dollars of aid to U.S farmers decimated by the collapse of Chinese agricultural purchases. Spurts of negotiation on trade and intellectual property were followed by escalating tariffs on Chinese imports that were paid by U.S. Of all the Trump administration’s many foreign-policy missteps, its confrontational stance on China was perhaps the most ungainly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |